On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:28:33 +0530, Dhawal Doshy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 May 2007 17:52:36 +0530, Rony
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>>> Dhawal Doshy wrote:
>>>> BTW, your proposed full-ubuntu precedes ubuntu and is called
>>>> debian.
>>>>
>>
>>> I have used both. Debian is not user friendly as Ubuntu. Debian is
>>> raw power. Ubuntu is tamed.
>>
>> While I understand that is the stereotype (Debian is unfriendly!), do
>> you happen to have concrete example where Debian is lacking (apart
>> from offering more choices to the user)?
>>
>> If such lacunae are reported, perhaps the next release are Debian
>> might turn out to be better.
> I slightly differ on this.. why doesn't debian (being the upstream
> provider for ubuntu) take feedback from the ubuntu community as well?
I don't recall prohibiting Ubuntu users from reporting flaws in
Debian. In my experience, though, the so called feedback to Debian
from Ubuntu is far more lip service than reality.
manoj
--
So you're back... about time...
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
