On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:19:12 +0530, jtd  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: 

> On Tuesday 11 September 2007 09:14, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> For what it is worth, in 20 years of usage, with two masters theses
>> and a Ph.D. thesis, I've never had TeX crash on me
>> -- not even once. And it understands kerning too.

> And it's the right tool for laying out a document and producing output
> in multiple formats.

        I think you mean docbook here.  TeX is designed for printing,
 though people have tried to hack dvi-to-html conversion with varying
 success. I tend to ship PDF, usually.

> Unfortunately my half hearted attemtps to use tex and Latex have been
> just that.

        Like a lot of capable tools, it does have a learning curve.

> Also afaik there is the problem of importing spreadsheets and
> documents from OO into tex.  I did attend a workshop by Dr.Nag many
> yrs ago and the o/p generated by tex in particular maths formula is
> years ahead of other layout tools.

        TeX is not a layout tool, or a word processor.  It is a
 Typesetting tool.

        And yes, trying to import a word processor document into TeX
 would be ... difficult, and, in my opinion, pointless.  The preferred
 method, I someone put a gun to my head, would be to export to plain
 text, and than add  TeX or LaTeX markup.

        I use TeX for print, and Docbook for online presentation; and
 usually the destination for the document is well enough established for
 me to chose one or the other a priori.

        manoj
-- 
"A dirty mind is a joy forever." Randy Kunkee
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


-- 
http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

Reply via email to