On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 05:46:55PM +0530, Nikhil Joshi wrote: > I've read that mutt relies on .rc file editing. > I'm planning to learn mutt but I just don't want to be disappointed if I > figure out that there ain't much difference between pine and mutt.
Mutt is anyday *much* faster than pine. Pine is userfriendly for the "menu oriented" people. mutt presents emails to you in threaded fashion ( configurable ), and makes them nicely coloured. You have access to all the headers by default. Best of all, you can configure mutt to have pine's key bindings! ( look in the docs and/or examples directory ). hth. -- jaju _______________________________________________ http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
