quasi,

The point in replying to your mail was to suggest other
alternatives. My suggestions were
1. Standard libraries (eg. Boost) --> if possible to use
2. If not --> use design methodologies eg. given is a
simple scanf implementation in windows crt

-shailesh

--- q u a s i <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 04:57 even 10/2/02 -0700, S...lesh wrote:
> >[...]At the same time, acknowledge the issues involved.
> 
> eh?  /Those/ issues where not the point of discussion.
> 
> >flexible storage v/s buffer overflow:
> >[...]
> >you r right in saying buffer overflow stems up from
> >predicted size of input.. but ur programming logic
> should take care of 
> >reading only as much as you can and rejecting the rest.
> 
> which I have already mentioned in great detail.  So why
> repeat the same point?
> 
> >In windoz CRT 'passing':
> >[...]and passing it in to user passed pointer!
> 
> agreeably I have not done any windows programming.  These
> above explained 
> details are new to be but slightly irrelevant as we are
> not discussing 
> /particular/ systems.
> 
> >hope that clarifies,
> 
> It does not clarify what your point is.  The matter was
> clear enough to me 
> earlier [except, the details of your example].
> 
> My original reaction was towards the insinuation by Satya
> that fixed arrays 
> are dangerous and the reason being buffer overflows.  My
> reply, though 
> travelling in a roundabout way, said the same thing that
> you did.  I did 
> not reply to your earlier mail because I felt we both had
> the same 
> point.  The linked buffers example I gave was ad-hock and
> was to support my 
> argument.  I never claimed it is even a good solution. 
> My exact statement 
> "For truly flexible storage a linked lists of buffers may
> be more the way 
> to go." - which is true enough.
> 
> Hope that /this/ clarifies your [mis]understandings.
> 
> > > consider me a dummy
> >ok.
> 
> thanks.  a good Samaritan, thou.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
> 


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com

_______________________________________________
http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers

Reply via email to