At 04:26 even 10/3/02 -0700, S wrote: >The point in replying to your mail was to suggest other alternatives.
thank you for your consideration. >My suggestions were >1. Standard libraries (eg. Boost) --> if possible to use unfortunately, I do not use C++ >2. If not --> use design methodologies eg. given is a simple scanf >implementation in windows crt more so, I do not program windows. thanks anyway, quasi _______________________________________________ http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
