On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Dinesh Joshi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:48 AM, VidAyer <[email protected]> wrote: >> citation needed. > > Find it yourself.
i dont have to, you claimed thus, so prove it. >> >> wrong. > > wrong. is that your best line of defense? :) >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leading_question >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy_of_many_questions >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inference_objection >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syllogism >> >> ++red herrings, obfuscation and a whole list of fallacies too. > > senseless plugs :) plugs? no. senseless? no. not if you had tried to understand the point, in the first place. > abusive? Stop your false accusations. According to your own article: > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CodeOfConductGuidelines its not my article. > You have broken codes 1,2,4,5,6. Hypocrite. ROTFLMAO. IIRC, you just said other projects rules were _not_ applicable to ILUG-BOM. Has it changed now? -- Vid || http://www.svaksha.com || -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
