On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Rony<[email protected]> wrote: > Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: >> On Tuesday 07 July 2009 08:51:43 Rony wrote: >> >>>> RHEL == Linux Kernel + GPL/BSD/MIT ...etc licensed Software + Red Hat >>>> trademarks (artwork etc) >>>> >>>> - How must does the RHEL distro cost ? >>>> * 0/- >>>> >>>> >>> RHEL is not available free of cost. The free of cost version is Fedora. >>> >> >> before replying to a message on a thread it is advisable to read the whole >> thread. Everything you have said in this mail has already been discussed, >> debated, archived, documented and published and the rest of us have moved on. >> Please enable threaded view in your mail client. >> > Every time someone asks a simple question whether Red Hat Enterprise > Linux ( RHEL) CDs can be copied and used on other machines, we give him > long technical details about removing trade marks, downloading free > sources etc. but we simply forget to say "No. You cannot duplicate RHEL > CDs as they are paid for and are not free of cost. If you want free of > cost, use Cent OS or Fedora". There ends the matter. Downloading free > sources, compiling them etc to make a free CD is not what the newbies > want to do. They are simply referring to making a copy of the _original_ > RHEL CD in their frequently asked questions. They cannot do that. > > -- > Regards, > > Rony. >
I second that. -- With Regards Abhishek Amberkar Learn to appreciate the beauty within... -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
