Praveen A wrote: > (Client forces top posting) > > How does installing rhel on another machine violates trademark? > > Logos or name is not misused. You are just calling a spade as spade. You are > not calling an axe as spade. >
If it was not provided legally by RedHat then it is a duplicate. Anyway it is not just a trade mark violation, it is an illegal copy that cannot be installed on other systems. > On Jul 8, 2009 2:43 AM, "Rony Bill" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 7/8/09, Praveen A <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/7/7 Rony < > [email protected]>: >> want to ... > Making a personal copy for preserving the original CD from scratches > is not the issue here. It is implied that the purpose of copying an > RHEL CD is to install it on other systems that are not within the > coverage of the paid-for installation. > > -- Regards, Rony. GNU/Linux ! No Viruses No Spyware Only Freedom. -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
