2009/7/9 Rony <[email protected]>: > If it was not provided legally by RedHat then it is a duplicate. Anyway > it is not just a trade mark violation, it is an illegal copy that cannot > be installed on other systems.
The legal basis is http://www.redhat.com/licenses/rhel_rha_eula.html which does not prevent making duplicate copies. If it is not a copyright violation (GPL grants this right to copy) and not a trademark violation (you agree to this already), it is perfectly legal copy. - Praveen -- പ്രവീണ് അരിമ്പ്രത്തൊടിയില് <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) Join The DRM Elimination Crew Now! http://fci.wikia.com/wiki/Anti-DRM-Campaign -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
