On Saturday 03 Jul 2010, narendra sisodiya wrote:
> We cannot say like this. which license has more freedom. If you think
> a developer who want social work then BSD is best option. Let you
> develop something and throw to the whole world irrespective of the
> fact that world is not good as you are. I never get any benefit from
> huge profit making companies (mostly) so why should I code with a
> license which permit them to reuse in any manner.
> The idea of GPL was to create a "*close community*" of hacker and
> users where we all share our knowledge and software. If anybody want
> to reuse our software, YES my dear most welcome, join this "close
> community" and become like us. The GPL was intended to make a "Viral
> Community".
> Well I am not opposing those who license their code under BSD but I
> am commenting on your comment on GPL ('Limited freedom') . Who says
> you have limited freedom with GPL. There is one Viral Statement in
> GPL. Which is good.Ah, long time since we had a BSD vs GPL flamewar! /me gets the popcorn and sells tickets to the show at the door. -- Raj Mathur [email protected] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F PsyTrance & Chill: http://schizoid.in/ || It is the mind that moves -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
