2011/1/3 Kenneth Gonsalves <[email protected]>: > An interesting thing is the so-called dual-licensed projects. Having a > 'community' edition with limited functionality to serve a bait to buy > the 'full version' which is proprietary. This is usually a massive con > job. And strangely enough 99% of dual licensed projects use the GPL. I > wonder why.
Could you give a few examples? The ones I have used have full-featured open-source editions. Binand -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
