On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 17:21 +0530, Binand Sethumadhavan wrote: > 2011/1/3 Kenneth Gonsalves <[email protected]>: > > An interesting thing is the so-called dual-licensed projects. Having > a > > 'community' edition with limited functionality to serve a bait to > buy > > the 'full version' which is proprietary. This is usually a massive > con > > job. And strangely enough 99% of dual licensed projects use the GPL. > I > > wonder why. > > Could you give a few examples? The ones I have used have full-featured > open-source editions.
zimbra -- regards KG http://lawgon.livejournal.com Coimbatore LUG rox http://ilugcbe.techstud.org/ -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
