On 11/25/2011 08:39 PM, [email protected] wrote: > On Friday 25 November 2011 18:40:32 Shamit Verma wrote: >>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 12:30 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> As an interesting aside: >>> The UIDAI specified error margins and duplicate verification system is >>> such a hoot, that they cant even verify themselves how many false rejects >>> or accepts are there. As per their specifications there will be well >>> above 200 million duplicates or rejects, which translates to 200 million >>> fakes - you dont know wether the Fprint is fake or the data is fake. >> It is a start. Like any system, there would be technical failures >> which will have to be corrected. > Yes. Do it with your money, not with public money. And dont make utterly > nonsensical claims. If you were a company (Read Infosys), making such claims, > you would get sued proper. Infosys was sued by the S'pore government when > they did this. Ofcourse such niceties skips the brainless UIDAI and their > supporters. >
The bad implementation of a good idea does not make the idea bad. -- Freedom is a shared resource. Take some, leave the rest for others. Please trim your replies. Avoid cross posting to other lists. Post your replies below the relevant original text, leaving a line space. Regards, Rony. http://ronybill.blogspot.com/ -- http://mm.ilug-bom.org.in/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
