On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Paul Mackerras wrote: > Guennadi Liakhovetski writes: > > > These two i2c patches: > > > > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-June/037327.html > > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-June/037328.html > > > > also would be nice to get in, although, they only make sense with an ack > > from Scott Wood and another patch from him, as explained in links above... > > Looks OK, but the first of those two patches doesn't have a > Signed-off-by: line, and the description is not suitable. > > Please repost that patch with a nice description that describes what > the patch does and why, without references to other web pages. You > don't need to describe what is different from previous patches or who > suggested those changes.
Sure, no problem, will repost with a description and a Signed-off-by... but, not giving Scott Wood credit for that patch doesn't seem right. Scott, is it ok with you if I repost that patch with your "Signed-off-by" first and mine second? And, Paul, as Scott noticed in another email and as I mentioned in the above post too, we also need this one, please: http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-May/036333.html As soon as we clarify these 2, I'll repost. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
