>>> Yet it's kinda accepted years ago, see: > >>> http://playground.sun.com/1275/proposals/Closed/Accepted/381-it.txt > >> That's not a published recommendation or anything like that. > > There's also this document with a status of "unapproved draft": > > http://playground.sun.com/1275/bindings/devices/html/8042.html > > So, all this never got final approval? Somewhat confusing (well, > what one could expect from OF? :-)
I think this 8042 thing became part of the CHRP binding. There never was a (published) x86 binding btw. So for our current purposes (flat device tree) I recommend we just do the minimal sane thing, i.e., no device_type and some good "compatible" entry. Segher _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
