So, like, the other day Paul Mackerras mumbled: > Jon Loeliger writes: > > > and its formats, command lines, descriptions, etc, > > over to the Device Tree Compiler repositories now. > > Hrm, section II (DT block format) is a description of a kernel > interface, and I think it should stay. After all, there's nothing
Hmm. That's a good point; I'll buy it. All of section II, then? > I have no problem with that section being copied over to the dtc > source. > > I also don't mind section IV being removed, although a sentence saying > that dtc is useful for generating dtbs, and where to find dtc, would > be useful. I will respin the patch as suggested! jdl _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
