>>>> Actually I see no good reason to enforce no-exec at all if we >>>> can't do >>>> it consistently. And if we're not going to enforce it then >>>> there is >>>> no point whinging about it. >>> >>> >>> I have a new patch with just this behaviour, Scott is >>> testing it on old glibc (I think it succeeded, need >>> confirmation though), >> >> It worked fine on glibc 2.2.5 and 2.3.3 (the former of which failed >> without the patch). > > It sounds like this is a candidate for stable 2.6.22.x as well
Yes, it replaces the previous patch and is a bugfix to it. > once you release the patch. The only reason I didn't send it out immediately was to not confuse things further with a broken patch ;-) Segher _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
