David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 08:33:18PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > [snip] > >>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/cuboot-8xx.c b/arch/powerpc/boot/cuboot-8xx.c >>new file mode 100644 >>index 0000000..35476a0 >>--- /dev/null >>+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/cuboot-8xx.c >>@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ >>+/* >>+ * Old U-boot compatibility for 8xx >>+ * >>+ * Author: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>+ * >>+ * Copyright (c) 2007 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. >>+ * >>+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it >>+ * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as published >>+ * by the Free Software Foundation. >>+ */ >>+ >>+#include "ops.h" >>+#include "stdio.h" >>+#include "cuboot.h" >>+ >>+#define TARGET_8xx >>+#define TARGET_HAS_ETH1 > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Is that really true for all 8xx boards?
Well, no. Even on a given board, it depends on the version of u-boot. There's nothing after enet1addr that the bootwrapper cares about, though, so the only harm is if the device tree has a second network interface but u-boot doesn't know about it, and the bootwrapper ends up pulling in junk rather than leaving zeroes. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list [email protected] https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
