> for the enumerated PHYs. As the original commit comment states, I was > getting these messages: > > prom_parse: Bad cell count for /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL > PROTECTED] > prom_parse: Bad cell count for /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL > PROTECTED]
Well, I would say it's a bug to try to translate addresses accross such a boundary. Thus the PHY enumeration code is bogus. > > I also wonder why it hangs on the powerbook... Rutger, I would expect to > > see that complaint warning with the reverted patch, what does it say ? > > > > My Wallstreet (also based on Grackle) doesn't have the problem. Also can > > you send me a tarball of /proc/device-tree ? > > I don't have any of those machines, but it seems that older kernels > running on the Lombard emitted: > > device-tree: Duplicate name in /cpus/PowerPC,[EMAIL PROTECTED], renamed to > "l2-cache#1" That's a different matter. > messages*. Experimenting with adding two chosen nodes (due to a prior > thread on this list**) results in a hung kernel on the 8360 also, so > perhaps they're related (and the kernel's tolerance to duplicate > entries has changed, which explains where I had seen the chosen node > being renamed). > > but yeah, size-cells should be allowed to be 0 (even address-cells) and > it may be the case that the Lombard needs some fixup code. Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev