Hello.
Zhu Ebony-r57400 wrote:
>>>>>>Did you end up getting testfloat running? I'd like to see some
>>>>>>testing results before accepting these patches. I think estfloat is
>>>>>>our best bet at this point.
>>>>>Hi Kumar,
>>>>>I looked into the testfloat suit, and found all the instructions it
>>>>>tests (more than 50)should be implemented based on ASM.
>>>>Don't follow? Can't you build it with the e500 compiler?
>>>The TestFloat suite provided the target of 386-Win32-gcc and
>>>SPARC-Solaris-gcc only, and a template for user to porting his own
>>>processor. Some general instructions are implemented in C, but some
>>>CPU specific instructions like evfsmul need to be implemented
>>>assemblely. To build it with e500 compiler we still Have some porting
>>>work to do.
>>I wouldn't worry too much about the vector forms. If the
>>scalar single fp and double fp test out ok the vectors are
>>pretty much similar enough.
>>Lets just get the scalar versions tested and work out any
>>issues there.
> OK, I will focus on scalar SFPF and DPFP versions first.
Any progress with this patchset?
WBR, Sergei
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
