> Which makes me think (again) that we should have an optional > device_node > pointer in irq_host. I know you said you wanted the irq stuff to be OF > agnostic, but the reality is most of the implementations do have an OF > node. And all of the newer irq_host implementations do, with the > exception of PS3 and celleb - which are special.
How do you suggest to get a reasonable display name out of the device tree? The recommended human-readable name for interrupt controller nodes is "interrupt-controller"... You cannot use "device_type" either, and using "compatible" requires selecting one of its string entries, and likely using a lookup table after that, too. Segher _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev