On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 21:42 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > Which makes me think (again) that we should have an optional > > device_node > > pointer in irq_host. I know you said you wanted the irq stuff to be OF > > agnostic, but the reality is most of the implementations do have an OF > > node. And all of the newer irq_host implementations do, with the > > exception of PS3 and celleb - which are special. > > How do you suggest to get a reasonable display name out of > the device tree? The recommended human-readable name for > interrupt controller nodes is "interrupt-controller"... > You cannot use "device_type" either, and using "compatible" > requires selecting one of its string entries, and likely > using a lookup table after that, too.
In that case, I would display the node full path. Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
