On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 22:37 +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > > Actually, checking for the presence of all possible perverted > mapping > props doesn't seem a good idea -- it's simpler to check for the > presence of > one prop (like "direct-mapped" I was thinking about, or maybe > "simple-map").
Or more simply... if it's not a direct mapping, it doesn't have a ranges property and can't be walked down by conventional means. Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
