On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 12:39:52PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> U-boots more recent than when ppcboot.h was forked allow the board config
> file to enable additional ethernet ports explicitly, rather than
> using a hardcoded list of targets. This allows bootwrapper platform
> files to do the same.
>
> Fortunately, nothing after the ethernet addresses is of interest to
> cuboot platforms, so the inevitable mismatches won't be too
> catastrophic.
Good grief. Increases my already considerable wonderment at the fact
that anyone ever thought bd_t was an acceptable way of passing data to
the OS.
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I can't say I'm thrilled at having two basically incompatible ways of
specifying the layout of this vital structure, but bd_t is so fscked
by design anyway, what's one more hack for convenience.
Acked-by: David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
