On Oct 30, 2007, at 6:40 PM, David Gibson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:14:06PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote: >> Jon Loeliger wrote: >>> So, like, the other day Kumar Gala mumbled: >>>> Jon, >>>> >>>> It seems like have libfdt as a unique git repo that is a >>>> submodule of >>>> the things that need it (dtc, u-boot, etc.) might make some >>>> sense and it >>>> easier for the projects that need to pull it in. >>>> >>>> Is this something you can take a look at? (or have other ideas on). >>> I would be fine with making libfdt a git repository separate >>> from the DTC repository if that makes it easier to integrate >>> it with other projects. > > I don't think it's a good idea to make dtc and libfdt entirely > seperate repositories (again). Being able to use both together in > their combined testsuite is very useful (libfdt is used to check trees > generated by dtc, dtc is used to generate example trees for libfdt > testing). > > I'm not sure how submodules/subrepositories work so I don't know if > that makes sense.
I believe submodules will accomplish this (at least from what I can tell). - k _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
