Jon Loeliger wrote: > So, like, the other day Kumar Gala mumbled: >> Jon, >> >> It seems like have libfdt as a unique git repo that is a submodule of >> the things that need it (dtc, u-boot, etc.) might make some sense and >> it easier for the projects that need to pull it in. >> >> Is this something you can take a look at? (or have other ideas on). > > I would be fine with making libfdt a git repository separate > from the DTC repository if that makes it easier to integrate > it with other projects. > > jdl
That sounds like a good idea to me. I would really prefer pulling patches out of a libfdt repo into the u-boot repo rather than trying to kerchunk upgrade lumps. While we can do this with a dtc repo, it potentially makes it a lot more difficult. gvb _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev