On 15/03/16 14:26, Russell Currey wrote:
The HMI code knows about three types of errors: CORE, NX and UNKNOWN.
If OPAL were to add a new type, it would not be handled at all since
there is no fallback case.  Instead of explicitly checking for UNKNOWN,
treat any checkstop type without a handler as unknown.

Signed-off-by: Russell Currey <rus...@russell.cc>

Indeed it looks like there isn't a fallback case.

Would it be useful to print xstop_type in the unknown case?

Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com>

--
Andrew Donnellan              Software Engineer, OzLabs
andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com  Australia Development Lab, Canberra
+61 2 6201 8874 (work)        IBM Australia Limited

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to