On 15/03/16 16:15, Russell Currey wrote:
Would it be useful to print xstop_type in the unknown case?

I don't think so - if there's a new checkstop type, specific handling for
it should be implemented in the kernel, and if you're getting unknown
checkstops that are bringing down your machine you should be looking at the
OPAL firmware log anyway, which would contain details if there was
something "new".

That's fair, would primarily help debugging in the rather corner case of new skiboot, old kernel, and no access to the OPAL log...

--
Andrew Donnellan              Software Engineer, OzLabs
andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com  Australia Development Lab, Canberra
+61 2 6201 8874 (work)        IBM Australia Limited

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to