On Tue, 2018-02-20 at 16:25 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote:
> > > > @@ -1055,6 +1082,8 @@ void restore_tm_state(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > >         msr_diff = current->thread.ckpt_regs.msr & ~regs->msr;
> > > >         msr_diff &= MSR_FP | MSR_VEC | MSR_VSX;
> > > >  
> > > > +       tm_recheckpoint(&current->thread);
> > > > +
> > > 
> > > So why do we do tm_recheckpoint at all? Shouldn't most of the tm_blah 
> > > code go
> > > away in process.c after all this?
> > > 
> > 
> > I'm not sure I follow, we need to recheckpoint because we're going back
> > to userspace? Or would you rather calling the tm.S code directly from
> > the exception return path?
> 
> Yeah, I was thinking the point of this series was.  We do tm_reclaim right on
> entry and tm_recheckpoint right on exit.  
> 

Yeah that's the ultimate goal, considering I haven't been attacked or
offered more drugs I feel like what I've done isn't crazy. Your
feedback is great, thanks.

> The bits in between (ie. the tm_blah() calls process.c) would mostly go away.
> 
> 
> > Yes, I hope we'll be able to have a fairly big cleanup commit of tm_
> > code in process.c at the end of this series.
> 
> Yep, agreed.
> 
> Mikey

Reply via email to