On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 09:14:39 -0300
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> On 03/13/2018 08:39 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> I agree; the 'Using fallback displacement flush' message is
> >> misleading (is the system slower/fallback or not? Ô_o)
> > That message is actually just wrong.
> > It still prints that even if enable=false.
> > So we should change all those messages, perhaps:
> > pr_info("rfi-flush: fallback displacement flush
> > available\n"); pr_info("rfi-flush: ori type flush available\n");
> > pr_info("rfi-flush: mttrig type flush available\n");
Maybe it would make more sense to move the messages to the function
that actually patches in the instructions?