On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:13:11 -0300
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 03/13/2018 02:59 PM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> > Maybe it would make more sense to move the messages to the function
> > that actually patches in the instructions?
> That helps, but if the instructions are not patched (e.g.,
> no_rfi_flush) then there is no information about what the system
> actually supports, which is useful for diagnostics/debugging (and
> patch verification! :-) )
Can't you patch with debugfs in that case?