On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 05:41:12PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > David Gibson wrote: > > > I'm not sure I'm entirely happy about storing the fragments under a > > special node - but certainly u-boot could do that if it wants. What > > would certainly be ok is to store various fragments as separate blobs > > and fold them together as necessary. Which reminds me, I meant to > > implement a "graft" function in libfdt. > > Most likely, U-Boot would strip out the special node after > processing it. The idea is for the boot loader to customize the > device tree based before sending it to the kernel.
Of course. U-boot can use whatever representation it likes internally, as long as it's all fixed up by the time it reaches the kernel. I just think using sepa`rate "device tree fragment" blobs might be a better way of doing it. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev