On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 10:13 -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: > > > From a device tree perspective, index and cell-index are both > > incorrect. The IIC macros don't share register blocks with anything, > > are enumerated as unique instances per macro in the device tree, and > > should be able to be distinguished by "regs" and/or unit address. > > I think we should just expand the definition of cell-index to include standard > device enumeration for when it's needed. The original definition is too > limited, IMHO.
No. I disagree. Expanding the definition is the wrong thing to do, and as I pointed out in an earlier mail, will not work well with SMP or multi-chip setups. Ben. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev