Excerpts from Haren Myneni's message of June 15, 2021 4:37 pm:
> On Mon, 2021-06-14 at 12:24 +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> Excerpts from Haren Myneni's message of June 13, 2021 8:57 pm:
>> > PowerNV uses registers to open/close VAS windows, and getting the
>> > paste address. Whereas the hypervisor calls are used on PowerVM.
>> >
>> > This patch adds the platform specific user space window operations
>> > and register with the common VAS user space interface.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Haren Myneni <ha...@linux.ibm.com>
>> > ---
>> > arch/powerpc/include/asm/vas.h | 14 +++++-
>> > arch/powerpc/platforms/book3s/vas-api.c | 53 +++++++++++++--
>> > ------
>> > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/vas-window.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++-
>> > 3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vas.h
>> > b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vas.h
>> > index bab7891d43f5..85318d7446c7 100644
>> > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vas.h
>> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/vas.h
>> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>> >
>> > #ifndef _ASM_POWERPC_VAS_H
>> > #define _ASM_POWERPC_VAS_H
>> > +#include <uapi/asm/vas-api.h>
>> >
>> > struct vas_window;
>> >
>> > @@ -48,6 +49,16 @@ enum vas_cop_type {
>> > VAS_COP_TYPE_MAX,
>> > };
>> >
>> > +/*
>> > + * User space window operations used for powernv and powerVM
>> > + */
>> > +struct vas_user_win_ops {
>> > + struct vas_window * (*open_win)(struct vas_tx_win_open_attr *,
>> > + enum vas_cop_type);
>> > + u64 (*paste_addr)(struct vas_window *);
>> > + int (*close_win)(struct vas_window *);
>> > +};
>>
>> This looks better, but rather than pull in uapi and the user API
>> structure here, could you just pass in vas_id and flags after the
>> common
>> code does the user copy and verifies the version and other details?
>>
>> I think it's generally good practice to limit the data that the usre
>> can influence as much as possible. Sorry for not picking up on that
>> earlier.
>
> The user space pass vas_tx_win_open_attr struct - use only vas_id and
> flags right now but it can be extended in future with reserve elements.
> So passing the same struct to platform specific API.
>
> do you prefer "struct vas_window * (*open_win)(vas_id, flags, cop)" and
> extend later when more elments are used?
Yes I think so. The reason being so you don't sending data under the
control of user very far into the kernel. Better safe than sorry.
Thanks,
Nick
