On Sat, 9 Apr 2022 01:58:29 +0200 Jakob Koschel wrote: > > This turns a pretty slick piece of code into something ugly :( > > I'd rather you open coded the iteration here than make it more > > complex to satisfy "safe coding guidelines". > > I'm not entirely sure I understand what you mean with > "open coded the iteration". But maybe the solution proposed by Vladimir [1] > works for you?
Yup, that's what I meant! > I'm planning to rewrite the cases in that way for the relevant ones. > > > Also the list_add() could be converted to list_add_tail(). > > Good point, I wasn't sure if that's considered as something that should be > done as a separate change. I'm happy to include it in v2. Ack, separate patch would be better for that. I guess Vladimir may have used .prev on purpose, since _tail() doesn't intuitively scream _after() Anyway, not important.
