On 02.02.24 09:07, Ryan Roberts wrote:
Split __flush_tlb_range() into __flush_tlb_range_nosync() +
__flush_tlb_range(), in the same way as the existing flush_tlb_page()
arrangement. This allows calling __flush_tlb_range_nosync() to elide the
trailing DSB. Forthcoming "contpte" code will take advantage of this
when clearing the young bit from a contiguous range of ptes.
Tested-by: John Hubbard <jhubb...@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.robe...@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
index 79e932a1bdf8..50a765917327 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ do {
\
#define __flush_s2_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, tlb_level) \
__flush_tlb_range_op(op, start, pages, stride, 0, tlb_level, false,
kvm_lpa2_is_enabled());
-static inline void __flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+static inline void __flush_tlb_range_nosync(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
unsigned long stride, bool last_level,
int tlb_level)
@@ -456,10 +456,19 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range(struct
vm_area_struct *vma,
__flush_tlb_range_op(vae1is, start, pages, stride, asid,
tlb_level, true, lpa2_is_enabled());
- dsb(ish);
mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs(vma->vm_mm, start, end);
}
+static inline void __flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
+ unsigned long stride, bool last_level,
+ int tlb_level)
+{
+ __flush_tlb_range_nosync(vma, start, end, stride,
+ last_level, tlb_level);
+ dsb(ish);
+}
+
static inline void flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
You're now calling dsb() after
mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs().
In flush_tlb_mm(), we have the order
dsb(ish);
mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs()
In flush_tlb_page(), we have the effective order:
mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs()
dsb(ish);
In flush_tlb_range(), we used to have the order:
dsb(ish);
mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs();
So I *suspect* having that DSB before
mmu_notifier_arch_invalidate_secondary_tlbs() is fine. Hopefully,
nothing in there relies on that placement.
Maybe wort spelling out in the patch description
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
