Hello,
On Fri, Nov 08, 2024 at 10:50:10AM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
>
>
> > On 7 Nov 2024, at 7:26 PM, Leo Yan <leo....@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Athira,
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2024 at 03:04:57PM +0530, Athira Rajeev wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>> Hi Athira,
> >>>
> >>> sorry for the breakage and thank you for the detailed explanation. As
> >>> the code will run on AMD I think your change will break that - . It is
> >>> probably safest to keep the ".. else { .." for this case but guard it
> >>> in the ifdef.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi Ian
> >>
> >> Thanks for your comments. Does the below change looks good ?
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> >> index e3aa9d4fcf3a..f5b2d96bb59b 100644
> >> --- a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> >> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> >> @@ -74,14 +74,12 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t
> >> __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
> >> double val, num_cpus_online, num_cpus, num_cores, num_dies,
> >> num_packages;
> >> int ret;
> >> struct expr_parse_ctx *ctx;
> >> - bool is_intel = false;
> >> char strcmp_cpuid_buf[256];
> >> struct perf_pmu *pmu = perf_pmus__find_core_pmu();
> >> char *cpuid = perf_pmu__getcpuid(pmu);
> >> char *escaped_cpuid1, *escaped_cpuid2;
> >>
> >> TEST_ASSERT_VAL("get_cpuid", cpuid);
> >> - is_intel = strstr(cpuid, "Intel") != NULL;
> >>
> >> TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL("ids_union", test_ids_union(), 0);
> >>
> >> @@ -244,11 +242,13 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t
> >> __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
> >> if (num_dies) // Some platforms do not have CPU die support, for
> >> example s390
> >> TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_dies >= #num_packages", num_dies >=
> >> num_packages);
> >>
> >> +#if defined(__i386__) && defined(__x86_64__)
> >> TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#system_tsc_freq", expr__parse(&val, ctx,
> >> "#system_tsc_freq") == 0);
> >> - if (is_intel)
> >> + if (strstr(cpuid, "Intel") != NULL)
> >> TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#system_tsc_freq > 0", val > 0);
> >> else
> >> TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#system_tsc_freq == 0", fpclassify(val) ==
> >> FP_ZERO);
> >> +#endif
> >>
> >> /*
> >> * Source count returns the number of events aggregating in a leader
> >
> > I confirmed the change above fixes the failure on Arm64.
> >
> > Tested-by: Leo Yan <leo....@arm.com>
> Thanks Leo Yan for testing.
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> If the change above looks good, I will post a V2 . Please share your review
> comments
Sorry for the delay, it looks good to me. Can you please send the v2?
Thanks,
Namhyung
