On Thu, 22 Jan 2026 20:10:44 +1100 Balbir Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> - Intel has demonstrated that this works and is still getting blocked. > >> > >> - This entire thread is about a fixes patch for large device pages. > >> Changing prep_compound_page is completely out of scope for a fixes > >> patch, and honestly so is most of the rest of what’s being proposed. > > > > FWIW I'm ok if this lands as a fix patch, and perceived the discussion to be > > about how refactor things more properly afterwards, going forward. > > > > I've said the same thing and I concur, we can use the patch as-is and > change this to set the relevant identified fields after 6.19 So the plan is to add this patch to 6.19-rc and take another look at patches [2-5] during next -rc cycle? I think the plan is to take Matthew's work via the DRM tree? But if people want me to patchbunny this fix then please lmk. I presently have Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <[email protected]> Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Balbir Singh <[email protected]> If people wish to add to this then please do so. I'll restore this patch into mm.git's hotfix branch (and hence linux-next) because testing.
