On 1/22/26 22:41, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jan 2026 20:10:44 +1100 Balbir Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> - Intel has demonstrated that this works and is still getting blocked. >> >> >> >> - This entire thread is about a fixes patch for large device pages. >> >> Changing prep_compound_page is completely out of scope for a fixes >> >> patch, and honestly so is most of the rest of what’s being proposed. >> > >> > FWIW I'm ok if this lands as a fix patch, and perceived the discussion to >> > be >> > about how refactor things more properly afterwards, going forward. >> > >> >> I've said the same thing and I concur, we can use the patch as-is and >> change this to set the relevant identified fields after 6.19 > > So the plan is to add this patch to 6.19-rc and take another look at > patches [2-5] during next -rc cycle? > > I think the plan is to take Matthew's work via the DRM tree? But if people > want me to patchbunny this fix then please lmk. > > I presently have > > Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Francois Dugast <[email protected]> > Acked-by: Felix Kuehling <[email protected]> > Reviewed-by: Balbir Singh <[email protected]> > > If people wish to add to this then please do so.
I did too. Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> > I'll restore this patch into mm.git's hotfix branch (and hence > linux-next) because testing.
