On Fri, 17 Jul 2026 17:26:54 -0500
Terry Bowman <[email protected]> wrote:
> cxl_rch_get_aer_severity() classifies RCH Downstream Port uncorrectable
> errors as fatal or non-fatal by ANDing uncorrectable status with
> PCI_ERR_ROOT_FATAL_RCV. This is wrong because PCI_ERR_ROOT_FATAL_RCV is a
> Root Error Status register bit (bit 6), not a severity bit. ANDing it
> against uncorrectable status tests a reserved bit and produces incorrect
> severity classification.
>
> Fix by ANDing the unmasked uncor_status against uncor_severity. Per
> PCIe Base Spec r6.0 Section 7.8.4.4, each bit in the Uncorrectable
> Error Severity register indicates whether the corresponding error is
> fatal (1) or non-fatal (0).
>
> Fixes: 6ac07883dbb5 ("cxl/pci: Add RCH downstream port error logging")
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Terry Bowman <[email protected]>
>
One trivial thing below, otherwise LGTM
Either way
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Changes in v17 -> v18:
> - New patch.
> ---
> drivers/cxl/core/ras_rch.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/ras_rch.c b/drivers/cxl/core/ras_rch.c
> index 0a8b3b9b63884..44b335d560708 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/ras_rch.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/ras_rch.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ static bool cxl_rch_get_aer_severity(struct
> aer_capability_regs *aer_regs,
> int *severity)
> {
> if (aer_regs->uncor_status & ~aer_regs->uncor_mask) {
> - if (aer_regs->uncor_status & PCI_ERR_ROOT_FATAL_RCV)
> + if ((aer_regs->uncor_status & ~aer_regs->uncor_mask) &
This bit looks familiar (see line above!) Worth a local variable maybe?
> + aer_regs->uncor_severity)
> *severity = AER_FATAL;
> else
> *severity = AER_NONFATAL;
