On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 06:17:47PM -0500, Paul Moore wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2026 at 4:35 PM Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Replace use of the legacy vm_flags_t flags with vma_flags_t values in the > > mmap and mprotect LSM hooks of SELinux, AppArmor, IMA and IPE. > > > > No functional change intended. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <[email protected]> > > --- > > security/apparmor/lsm.c | 2 +- > > security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +- > > security/ipe/hooks.c | 2 +- > > security/selinux/hooks.c | 14 +++++++------- > > 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > Similar to the other patchset you just posted, is there any reason why > individual subsystem maintainers can't pick these patches up, or is > there some reason I'm missing and they need to go through a single > tree? > > If they can go through multiple trees, can you split this patch up? > AppArmor, Integrity/IMA, IPE, and SELinux are all maintained by > different groups/people.
Sure, they're all independent so you can take the security bits through your tree, I guess fairly easy for Andrew/David to figure out which went where? Intentionally made these easy ones given how busy the cycle is, just keeping the conversion rolling forward :) -- Cheers, Lorenzo
