On 11/5/2026 5:22 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > On Thu, Nov 5, 2026 at 6:17 PM Paul Moore <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 5, 2026 at 4:35 PM Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Replace use of the legacy vm_flags_t flags with vma_flags_t values in the >> > mmap and mprotect LSM hooks of SELinux, AppArmor, IMA and IPE. >> > >> > No functional change intended. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <[email protected]> >> > --- >> > security/apparmor/lsm.c | 2 +- >> > security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 2 +- >> > security/ipe/hooks.c | 2 +- >> > security/selinux/hooks.c | 14 +++++++------- >> > 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >> >> Similar to the other patchset you just posted, is there any reason why >> individual subsystem maintainers can't pick these patches up, or is >> there some reason I'm missing and they need to go through a single >> tree? >> >> If they can go through multiple trees, can you split this patch up? >> AppArmor, Integrity/IMA, IPE, and SELinux are all maintained by >> different groups/people. > > Since there seems to be a desire to bypass normal procedure in favor > of speed (surely that will never backfire), the SELinux changes look > fine to me, but please do wait to hear from the AppArmor, IMA, and IPE > maintainers before merging this patch. > > Acked-by: Paul Moore <[email protected]> >
For the IPE part: Acked-by: Fan Wu <[email protected]>
