On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 08:21:18AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: [...] >> arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc834x_mds.c | 1 + >> arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc837x_mds.c | 1 + >> arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/mpc837x_rdb.c | 1 + >> 14 files changed, 398 insertions(+), 319 deletions(-) > > If we do this we should also fixup all the 85xx & 86xx .dts
OK. It would be great to have #include <gianfar_enet.dts> facility in .dts files. ;-) I heard some rumors about this, what was the consequence?.. [...] >> + ranges; > > Can this be proper? > ranges = <0x0 0x24520 0x20>; Yes, will change. I was actually asking that q in RFC, i.e. whether we want proper ranges or these stubs (I took stubs approach since it's already in mpc8313_rdb device tree). Thanks, -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmai...@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
