On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 10:43:07AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 06:28:00PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > It would be great to have #include <gianfar_enet.dts> facility in .dts
> > files. ;-) I heard some rumors about this, what was the consequence?..
>
> You can already do a raw include, but in most cases it needs parameterized
> templates/macros to make it useful. There were some patches floating around
> for that, but there was some disagreement about syntax and the discussion
> seems to have died out.
Yeah - basically Jon got busy with other things, so we no longer had
critical mass to keep things moving. I have an idea for a partway
step that will be enough for at least some applications without making
life awkward for a more complete approach later. Basically the idea
is just to have "weak" property assignments - you can have an include
file which has a bunch of these, but they can be silently overriden by
normal property assignments afterwards.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
