On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:23:44PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 03:05:51PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > Anton Vorontsov wrote: > >> Currently it doesn't matter where the mdio nodes are placed, but with > >> power management support (i.e. when sleep = <> properties will take > >> effect), mdio nodes placement will become important: mdio controller > >> is a part of the ethernet block, so the mdio nodes should be placed > >> correctly. Otherwise we may wrongly assume that MDIO controllers are > >> available during sleep. > >> > >> NOTE: mpc8572ds_camp_core1.dts now fully specifies ether...@24000 > >> layout. ether...@24000 node is disabled via status = "disabled on > >> core1" property. > > > > Hmm, would that imply that the mdio underneath it is disabled as well? > > Technically, yes. In practice, MDIO and MAC drivers are probed > separately. > > I don't see any better solution, should I just leave the core1's > mdio node intact?
Ah. We also could change compatible entry to "fsl,gianfar-slave". This will prevent gianfar MAC driver to probe on core1. -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmai...@gmail.com irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
