On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote: >> However, on the other point, Jon is correct. The first value in the >> list should be "atmel,24c32", not "at24,24c32". > > Yeah. So perhaps "atmel,24c32","24c32" ? I'm not terribly happy > with that last name, but these devices are _very_ common.
I don't think the last name is necessary at all. I'd leave it at "atmel,24c32". non-atmel parts can claim compatibility with the atmel version if really necessary. I don't like the 'generic' version either. g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
