Any particular reason you fixed only one of the two
mispelings I pointed out? (device tree is two words,
not one).
Ahh, my fault.
Well I wasn't terribly clear ;-)
You could use one property instead of two; use addr+len
like every other property does.
You also should use a better name for the property; is this
the previous kernel's device tree? Just "device-tree" makes
no sense, it is not pointing to "the" device tree for sure!
What about just one node called "flat-device-tree"?
But *what* flat device tree? It cannot be "the" flat device tree,
or it would be useless information, since we are already reading it!
Segher
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
