On Wed, 2010-07-14 at 17:46 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > What about just one node called "flat-device-tree"? > > But *what* flat device tree? It cannot be "the" flat device tree, > or it would be useless information, since we are already reading it!
I thought about it all day and did not come up with anything terribly insightful... "boot-fdt-phys-addr" "fdt-phys-addr" "boot-fdt-phys-reg" "fdt-phys-addr-reg" Thoughts? -M _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
