On 01/24/2012 04:08 PM, Grant Likely wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Rob Herring <robherri...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 01/23/2012 03:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote: >>> Part of the series to unify the irq remapping mechanisms in the >>> kernel. A follow up patch will copy the powerpc implementation into >>> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c, which will be a lot easier if the structures >>> are identical. >>> >>> Where they differ, I've chose to use the powerpc names since there is >>> a lot more code using those names. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.lik...@secretlab.ca> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/common/gic.c | 14 ++++---- >>> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 84 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- >>> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 14 ++++---- >>> 3 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) >>> >> >> snip... >> >>> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ void irq_dispose_mapping(unsigned int irq) >>> } >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_dispose_mapping); >>> >>> -int irq_domain_simple_dt_translate(struct irq_domain *d, >>> +int irq_domain_simple_xlate(struct irq_domain *d, >>> struct device_node *controller, >>> const u32 *intspec, unsigned int intsize, >>> unsigned long *out_hwirq, unsigned int *out_type) >> >> This needs a declaration in irqdomain.h (as well as EXPORT?). There >> could be others as well, but this is the one I'm using for generic irq chip. > > Fine by me. I'll add that as a follow-on patch since nothing in-tree > currently depends on that. It will be in the next version of the > patch series. Also, are you okay if I rename it to > irq_domain_generic_xlate()? Simple doesn't really describe it well, > and it can be used for any interrupt controller implementing the > binding we've settled on as recommended for new device support. >
Okay. Rob _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
