On Mon, 2012-06-25 at 17:54 +0800, Li Zhong wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> index 620b7ac..c9d2a7f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -130,6 +130,9 @@ void pgtable_cache_add(unsigned shift, void
> (*ctor)(void *))
> align = max_t(unsigned long, align, minalign);
> name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "pgtable-2^%d", shift);
> new = kmem_cache_create(name, table_size, align, 0, ctor);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB
> + kfree(name); /* SLUB duplicates the cache name */
> +#endif
> PGT_CACHE(shift) = new;
>
> pr_debug("Allocated pgtable cache for order %d\n", shift);
This is very gross ... and fragile. Also the subtle difference in
semantics between SLUB and SLAB is a VERY BAD IDEA.
I reckon you should make the other allocators all copy the name
instead.
Ben.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
